Gender equity in healthcare academia: a qualitative comparison of faculty experiences in public and private medical colleges in Pakistan

Volume 1
|
Pages 23-
|
2025
1 Views
|
0 Downloads
|
0 Crossref Citations

Abstract

Gender equity is important in healthcare academic institutions for operational effectiveness, quality medical education and workforce sustainability; however, the professional careers of faculty across the globe are influenced by gender‑based disparities. This qualitative descriptive study explored and compared the perceptions and experiences of faculty members regarding gender equality in public and private medical colleges in Punjab, Pakistan. In‑depth semi‑structured interviews were conducted with 19 teaching faculty members from one public and one private medical college through purposive sampling to ensure variation in gender, academic rank, discipline, and years of experience. The interviews were audio‑recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed following Braun and Clarke’s framework of thematic analysis. Data saturation was achieved for the tenth participant in the private sector and the ninth participant in the public sector college. Four major themes, namely, gendered career progression and promotion pathways, workplace culture and implicit gender bias, work–life balance and institutional support, and institutional context and sector‑specific differences, emerged. Female faculty members reported promotional delays, inadequate leadership opportunities, and inconsistent household responsibilities, whereas male faculty members outlined gender-based inequities as systemic rather than premeditated. Although public and private colleges differed in terms of their governance and administrative structures, gender inequities were reported in both, marked by limited institutional support mechanisms and unclear promotion processes and informal practices across the system. By providing context‑-specific qualitative evidence, this study concludes that gender equity in healthcare academia is beyond the numerical representation of males and females in an institution and requires systemic as well as organizational reforms for the implementation of the concept in true spirit.

Supplementary materials

The following supporting information can be accessed through the embedded link(s): Supplementary Table/Figure S1. [Table/Figure Caption]; and Supplementary Table/Figure S2. [Table/Figure Caption].

Author contributions

Conceptualization, XX, and YY; methodology, XX; software, XX; validation, XX, YY, and ZZ; formal analysis, XX; investigation, XX; resources, XX; data curation, XX; writing—original draft preparation, XX; writing—review and editing, XX; visualization, XX; supervision, XX; project administration, XX; funding acquisition, YY. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The author himself/herself wrote and revised the manuscript.

Publication history

Received Revised Accepted Published
19 May 2025 27 October 2025 10 November 2025 31 December 2025

Use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies

During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used [NAME OF TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Funding

Please add: “This research received no specific grant from the public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.”, “This research was funded by NAME OF FUNDER, grant number XXX” and “The APC was funded by XXX”. Check carefully that the details are accurate and use the standard spelling of funding agency names at https://search.crossref.org/funding.

Data availability

This section provides details regarding where data supporting reported results can be found, including links to publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study. Please refer to the suggested Data Availability Statements in the section “Editorial Policies” at https://logixsjournals.com/journals/1/editorial-policy. If the study did not report any data, you might add “Not applicable” here.
The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author, [Author Name], upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of interest

Declare conflicts of interest or state, “The author(s) declare(s) no conflicts of interest.” Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interests that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results. Any role of the funders in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results must be declared in this section. If there is no role, please state, “The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results”.

Publisher's note

Logixs Journals re­mains neutral concerning jurisdic­tional claims in its published subject matter, including maps and institutional affiliations.

Cited by (0)