A comparative study of life satisfaction and psychological stress levels among male and female allied health college students

Volume 1
Pages 22-29
0 Crossref Citations


Gender differences in psychological disorders have distinct gender profiles, with males more susceptible to aggressive behavior, hypertension, and substance abuse and females more prone to depression and anxiety. Likewise, stress responses among both genders vary physiologically and psychologically, which could lead to complications in many ways. Therefore, this study aimed to determine gender differences in life satisfaction and psychological stress levels among allied health college students. Using a purposive sampling technique, a comparative cross-sectional study recruited 190 male and 190 female students. The self-administered questionnaire included questions related to sociodemographics and two validated scales, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Descriptive statistics were calculated for the study variables, and the students' locality was compared by gender using the chi-square test. Moreover, other sociodemographics, PSS, and SWLS scores were compared by gender using the Mann‒Whitney U test, and the chi-square test was used to determine gender differences in the outcomes of SWLS. The study results showed that the PSS and SWLS scores were higher among female students than their male counterparts, which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Furthermore, female students were more satisfied with their life than male students, which was also statistically significant (p < 0.05). Our study highlights that female first-year allied health students are more likely to encounter psychological stress, despite being more satisfied with their lives than male students. Therefore, establishing a student support committee within the allied health faculty or university is recommended to provide counseling and guidance in healthy ways to cope with psychological stress for both male and female students.


Gender differences; Personal satisfaction; Life stress; Psychological stress; Allied health students

1. Introduction

Psychological stress is a cognitive and behavioral experience leading people to react in several ways [1]. It accompanies widespread effects affecting mental capabilities, limiting thinking capacity, creativity, sense of pleasure, relaxation, and social networking, or reducing physical activities [2]. Stress is attributed to changes in the body's neurotransmitters and can emerge from various disorders, such as depression [3]. It also affects significant physiological systems of the human body, including the hypothalamic‒pituitary‒adrenal pathway, the autonomic nervous system, and the immune system [4]. Moreover, stress can influence the body's reaction, including feelings and responses to alarming situations [5]. People suffering from stress may experience mild to moderate feelings of being restless, nervous, furious, forceful, touchy, baffled, miser, and discouraged [6].

Demographics are vital determinants of population health. Gender differences in psychological disorders have distinct gender profiles [7,8]. For instance, males are more susceptible to aggressive behavior, hypertension, and substance abuse. At the same time, conditions such as depression and anxiety are more prevalent among females. Additionally, stress responses among both genders vary widely physiologically and psychologically, which could lead to complications in many ways and at different intervals [9,10]. Stress-coping skills are pivotal to preventing poststress complications [11]. Understanding and exercising stress coping skills is a debatable area among the genders but a limitation of our study [12].

Currently, stress is common among female and male college students who report being more stressed than ever before [13,14]. Various studies have reported differences in students of both genders, where males experience a marginal amount of stress compared to their female counterparts, with no differences in coping with stress [15,16]. Stress is attributed as an impediment to a student's academic performance, underlining various stressors such as educational nature, social isolation, inflexible study schedules, tight timeframes, the burden of high fees, growing parents' expectations, peer pressure, and future anxiety [17,18,19]. In addition, the new intake of students experiences a high stress level due to environmental changes [20]. A study found that nearly one-third of newly admitted students are most prone to become addicted to drugs, including marijuana, alcohol, and nicotine, to cope with various stress factors [20].

The situation of Pakistani students does not differ from other countries, and students experience a significant amount of psychological stress leading to mild to moderate effects on their physical health. However, a higher stress level is prevalent among female students than male students [21]. Therefore, it is a pressing priority to understand the general and genderwise comparison concerning psychological stress among college students.

The results of the Kumar et al. study showed a negative correlation between life satisfaction and stress level among college students enrolled in various disciplines, including engineering, social sciences, and medical sciences, with the reported stress levels ranging between 17% and 23% [22]. It is learned by the authors that college students are exposed to mental health issues which have been well recognized in western societies as a serious public concern. Unfortunately, it requires serious attention in Eastern societies such as Pakistan, where several aspects of this phenomenon are still unclear concerning the youth population [22]. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine gender differences in life satisfaction and psychological stress levels among allied health college students.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Study design

The present study employs a comparative cross-sectional design.

2.2. Ethical considerations and approval

The Ethics Review Committee of Hussain College of Health Sciences approved this study (No. HCHS/2021/ERC/07). Moreover, the study adhered to international ethical principles for conducting research involving human participants.

2.3. Study duration

Data were gathered between April and August 2021.

2.4. Study setting

This study was conducted at a public university, i.e., Government College University Faisalabad (GCUF), and its privately affiliated health sciences colleges in Lahore.

2.5. Participant recruitment

The study recruited male and female students aged 18 years and above who were enrolled in the degree program as regular students and physically attending classes on campus for at least six months but not more than a year. To avoid potential confounding effects, students with preexisting psychiatric or medical conditions or disabilities that could affect their life satisfaction and psychological stress levels were excluded from the study. Moreover, students with physical disabilities that may prevent them from completing the study questionnaire were also excluded.

2.6. Sample size and sampling technique

The estimated population proportion of severe stress levels among male students was 11.7%, while it was 30.00% among female students, as reported in a previously conducted study [23]. Sample size calculation was then performed using the World Health Organization (WHO) sample size calculator for hypothesis testing on two population proportions, with a significance level of 5% and a power of 95%. Based on these proportions, the calculated sample size was 126. However, to account for potential dropouts, refusals, and other factors that may affect participation rates, the final sample size was increased to 190 male and 190 female students. In this study, a purposive sampling technique was employed to select a sample representative of the target population, i.e., allied health college students, who are a homogeneous group of individuals.

2.7. Study instrument development

The study instrument for this research consisted of a questionnaire comprising students' sociodemographic information and two validated scales: the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) [24,25].

2.8. Data collection procedures

The data collection procedure for this study involved self-administered surveys, where participants were provided with questionnaires and a consent form. Any questionnaires received by the survey administrator without written informed consent or with incomplete consent forms were excluded from the analysis.

2.9. Study measures

The study collected sociodemographic information from participants, including age (in years), gender (male, female), monthly household income in Pakistani rupees (PKR), and locality. Two validated scales were employed to measure stress and life satisfaction: the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) [24,25].

The PSS-10 scale consists of ten questions that measure an individual’s subjective perception of stress. Participants rated their responses on a five-point Likert scale from ‘never’ to ‘very often,’ with scores ranging from 0 to 4, except for items 4, 5, 7, and 8, whose scores were reversed before calculating the final score [26]. The PSS score was obtained by summing all item scores, indicating levels of perceived stress in ascending order.

The SWLS scale comprises five questions that measure an individual's global cognitive judgment of their own life satisfaction. Participants rated their responses on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree.’ A score ranging from 5 to 35 was obtained by summing all items' scores. The final score was used to categorize satisfaction with life as extremely dissatisfied (5 – 9), dissatisfied (10 – 14), slightly dissatisfied (15 – 19), neutral (20), slightly satisfied (21 – 25), satisfied (26 – 30), and extremely satisfied (31 – 35) [27].

2.10. Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, medians, and interquartile ranges (IQRs), were computed for all study variables. The association between students' locality and gender was examined using the chi-square test. In addition, the Mann‒Whitney U test was used to compare sociodemographic indicators, PSS, and SWLS scores by gender. The chi-square test was also used to assess gender differences in the outcomes of SWLS. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Table 1 displays the age distribution of the study participants, revealing an average age of 19 years (IQR = 1.00). Analysis of the data demonstrated that female students had a higher median monthly household income (PKR 45,000; IQR = 18,875) than male students (PKR 38,000; IQR = 26,250), with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The majority of male (63.16%) and female (76.32%) students reported living in urban areas.

Table 1. Demographic indicators of allied health college students by gender (n = 380).
Demographic Indicators Males
n = 190
n = 190
p values *, **
Median IQR Median IQR
Age (in years) 19.00 1.00 19.00 1.00 0.537
Monthly household income (in PKR) 38,000.00 26,250.00 45,000.00 18,875.00 0.004 ***
Locality of students Urban, N (%) 120 63.16 145 76.32 0.005 ***
Rural, N (%) 70 36.84 45 23.68
* Variables are compared using the Mann‒Whitney U test. ** The students' locality is compared using the chi-square test. *** Significant at p < 0.05.

The results presented in Table 2 indicate that female students had a higher median PSS score (21.00) than their male counterparts (20.00). Similarly, female students had a higher median SWLS score (24.50) than male students (20.50), with both differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Table 2. Genderwise differences in PSS and SWLS scores among students (n = 380).
Study Variables Males
n = 190
n = 190
p values *
Median IQR Median IQR
PSS 20.00 5.00 21.00 7.00 0.041 **
SWLS 20.50 10.00 24.50 8.00 0.019 **
* PSS and SWLS scores are compared using the Mann‒Whitney U test. ** Significant at p < 0.05.

Table 3 shows that female students expressed higher levels of satisfaction with their life, with 32.63% being slightly satisfied, 30.53% being satisfied, and 5.79% being extremely satisfied. In comparison, male students had lower levels of satisfaction, with 17.89% being slightly satisfied, 29.47% being satisfied, and 2.63% being extremely satisfied. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Table 3. Genderwise differences in SWLS outcomes (n = 380).
SWLS Outcomes Males
n = 190
n = 190
p values *
N % N %
Extremely dissatisfied 0 0.00
3 1.58 0.001 **
Dissatisfied 44 23.16
28 14.74
 Slightly dissatisfied 21 11.05
17 8.95
Neutral 30 15.79
11 5.79
 Slightly satisfied 34 17.89
62 32.63
Satisfied 56 29.47
58 30.53
 Extremely satisfied 5 2.63
11 5.79
* Variables are compared using the Chi-square test. ** Significant at p < 0.05.

4. Discussion

The results of this study revealed several important findings regarding the demographic characteristics and psychological well-being of allied health college students. Female students reported a significantly higher level of perceived stress than their male counterparts, as measured by the PSS-10 scale. Furthermore, female students had a significantly higher global cognitive judgment of their own life satisfaction, as measured by the SWLS scale. The results suggest that gender may play a significant role in the psychological well-being of allied health college students. These findings have important implications for healthcare providers and policymakers, who should consider gender differences when designing interventions to promote college students' mental health and well-being.

Our study's findings are consistent with a previous Turkish study that examined the association between perceived stress and life satisfaction using the SWLS and PSS scales among 235 college students [28]. The study found a negative correlation between SWLS and PSS scores (p < 0.05), indicating that students were satisfied with their lives, but their satisfaction was negatively impacted by college stress. Additionally, female students reported higher life satisfaction scores than their male counterparts [28]. Therefore, the higher stress levels experienced by female students may be attributed to their increased susceptibility to psychological pressures and higher academic stress levels than their male counterparts [29].

Another study compared perceived stress and life satisfaction between Turkish and American university students and reported no significant gender differences within each country [30]. However, research has consistently shown that females are more vulnerable to stress and have fewer coping resources than their male counterparts [31]. For female students, stress may stem from personal reasons such as emotional overload, family dynamics, peer pressure, lack of parental support, family environment, restrictions from families, limited travel options, and financial dependence [32].

A study conducted in the United States (US) using SWLS and PSS scales found a negative correlation between general life satisfaction and college students' stress [33]. The study's findings indicate that college stress adversely affects life satisfaction, as supported by the negative correlation between SWLS and PSS scores. Moreover, the study reported higher levels of college stress among female students than their male peers [33], which is consistent with our study's results. Satisfaction with life among male and female students may be influenced by factors such as their relationships with parents, close friends, socioeconomic status, and living arrangements [34]. Moreover, female students may experience stress due to academic reasons, including class schedules, high-performance expectations, demanding study routines, and lower grades [35,36].

A Pakistani study recruited 152 male and 123 female university students to determine the impact of gender on life satisfaction using SWLS [37]. Contrary to our study's findings, the study reported no significant difference in life satisfaction by gender. However, life satisfaction was positively correlated with age, and cultural difference was identified as a predictor of life satisfaction. Male and female students' life satisfaction can also be influenced by studying the desired discipline, being in the department of choice, having work experience, and having self-reported mental health status [38]. These factors can lead to higher student satisfaction, better academic performance, and lower stress levels [39].

In contrast with our findings, a study of medical students using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Life Satisfaction Index reported that 63.4% of participants had low life satisfaction, but there was no significant difference by gender [40]. Another study assessed life satisfaction and life demand and found that male and female students were highly satisfied with life despite a demanding lifestyle [41]. However, students with lower life satisfaction had low personal stress. Additionally, a Malaysian study assessing gender differences in stress and life satisfaction reported no significant difference [42]. Age also plays a vital role in life satisfaction, as studies have shown that with age, students adapt to changes, develop better coping skills, deal with challenges more effectively, and improve their quality of life [43].

This study has several strengths, including its location at a major university in Punjab, one of Pakistan's most populous provinces, and its focus on young health sciences students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. However, it bears mentioning that these findings may not apply to other provinces in Pakistan. Therefore, further large-scale studies are imperative to address the literature gap and support health science students' mental health and well-being. Nonetheless, the results of this study provide valuable insights into the psychological well-being of allied health college students, which could be used to develop targeted interventions for this population.

5. Conclusions

Our study highlights that female first-year allied health students are more likely to encounter psychological stress, despite being more satisfied with their lives than male students. Therefore, we recommend establishing a student support committee within the allied health faculty or university to provide counseling and guidance in healthy ways to cope with psychological stress for both male and female students. This committee could be staffed by trained professionals, such as psychologists or mental health counselors, and could offer stress-management workshops and individual counseling sessions.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, HA, and NN; methodology, HA, and NN; software, HA, and NN; validation, HA; formal analysis, HA, and NN; investigation, HA, and NN; resources, HA; data curation, NN; writing—original draft preparation, HA, and NN; writing—review and editing, HA; visualization, HA, and NN; supervision, HA; project administration, HA. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Publication history

Received Revised Accepted Published
15 November 2022 20 December 2022 26 December 2022 29 December 2022


This research received no specific grant from the public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies.

Ethics statement

The Ethics Review Committee of Hussain College of Health Sciences approved this study (No. HCHS/2021/ERC/07).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all students included in the study.

Data availability

The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author, Hira, upon reasonable request.


I wish to thank all the faculty, staff, and administration of the Government College University Faisalabad and its affiliated colleges in Lahore.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


© 2022 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) Li­cense. The use, distribution, or re­production in other forums is per­mitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or re­production is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Publisher's note

Logixs Journals re­mains neutral concerning jurisdic­tional claims in its published subject matter, including maps and institutional affiliations.



Zhang L. Gender differences and the moderating role of stress mindset in stressful life events and well-being. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2021); 2021 Nov 26-28; Sanya, China. Zhengzhou: Atlantis Press; p. 1349-54. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220105.248


Koolhaas JM, Bartolomucci A, Buwalda B, de Boer SF, Flügge G, Korte SM, et al. Stress revisited: A critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(5):1291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003


Pearlin LI, Menaghan EG, Lieberman MA, Mullan JT. The stress process. J Health Soc Behav. 1981;22(4):337-56.


Appley MH, Trumbull RA, editors. Dynamics of stress: Physiological, psychological and social perspectives. New York (NY): Plenum Press; 1986.


Hendrix WH, Ovalle NK, Troxler RG. Behavioral and physiological consequences of stress and its antecedent factors. J Appl Psychol. 1985;70(1):188-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.188


Stone V, Donaldson K. Signs of stress. Nat Nanotechnol. 2006;1:23-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2006.69


Holden C. Sex and the Suffering Brain. Science. 2005;308(5728):1574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.308.5728.1574


Kudielka BM, Kirschbaum C. Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: A review. Biol Psychol. 2005;69(1):113-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.009


Lundberg U. Stress hormones in health and illness: The roles of work and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30(10):1017-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.03.014


Wentz L, Liu PY, Haymes E, Ilich JZ. Females have a greater incidence of stress fractures than males in both military and athletic populations: A systemic review. Mil Med. 2011;176(4):420-30. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-10-00322


Heath DT, Orthner DK. Stress and adaptation among male and female single parents. J Fam Issues. 1999;20(4):557-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251399020004007


Mallach CS. Coping with stress amongst males and females in professional occupations [dissertation]. Pretoria (SA): University of South Africa; 1996.


Pryor JH, Hurtado S, DeAngelo L, Blake LP, Tran S. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. The American freshman: National norms fall 2010. Los Angeles (LA): University of California Press; 2010.


Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M, et al. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Health. 2020;16:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w


Ng DM. Jeffrey RW. Relationship between perceived stress and health behaviours in a sample of working adults. Health Psychol. 2003;22(6):638–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.638


Thawabien AM, Qaisy LM. Assessing stress among university students. American Int J Contemp Res. 2012;2(2):110-16.


Murphy RJ, Gray SA, Sterling G, Reeves K, DuCette J. A comparative study of professional student stress. J Dent Educ. 2009;73(3):328-37.


Afridi A, Fahim MF. Identification of stressors and perceptional difference of stress in first and final year doctor of physical therapy students; a comparative study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019;69(4):572-5.


Behere SP, Yadav R, Behere PB. A comparative study of stress among students of medicine, engineering, and nursing. Indian J Psychol Med. 2011;33(2):145-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.92064


Moreno MA, Jelenchick LA, Egan KG, Cox E, Young H, Gannon KE, et al. Feeling bad on Facebook: Depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depress Anxiety. 2011;28(6):447-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20805


Sabih F, Siddiqui FR, Baber MN. Assessment of stress among physiotherapy students at Riphah Centre of Rehabilitation Sciences. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(3):346-9.


Kumar H, Shaheen A, Rasool I, Shafi M. Psychological distress and life satisfaction among university students. J Psychol Clin Psychiatry. 2016;5(3):00283. https://doi.org/10.15406/jpcpy.2016.05.00283


Sohail N. Stress and academic performance among medical students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013;23(1):67-71.


Lee EH. Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nurs Res. 2012;6(4):121-7.


López-Ortega M, Torres-Castro S, Rosas-Carrasco O. Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Secondary analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0573-9 


Mozumder MK. Reliability and validity of the Perceived Stress Scale in Bangladesh. PloS One. 2019;17(10):e0276837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276837


Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71-5. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13


Kaya C, Tansey TN, Melekoğlu M, Çakiroğlu O. Stress and life satisfaction of Turkish college students. Coll Stud J. 2015;49(2):257-61.


Karaman MA, Lerma E, Vela JC, Watson JC. Predictors of academic stress among college students. J Coll Couns. 2019;22(1):41-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocc.12113


Matheny KB, Curlette WL, Aysan F, Herrington A, Gfroerer CA, Thompson D, et al. Coping resources, perceived stress, and life satisfaction among Turkish and American university students. Int J Stress Manag. 2002;9:81-97. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014902719664


Gazzaz ZJ, Baig M, Al Alhendi BSM, Al Suliman MMO, Al Alhendi AS, Al-Grad MSH, et al. Perceived stress, reasons for and sources of stress among medical students at Rabigh Medical College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1133-2


Ross SE, Niebling BC, Heckert TM. Sources of stress among college students. Coll Stud J. 1999;33(2):312-8.


Weinstein L, Laverghetta A. College student stress and satisfaction with life. Coll Stud J. 2009;43(4):1161-2.


Chow HPH. Life satisfaction among university students in a Canadian prairie city: A multivariate analysis. Soc Indic Res. 2005;70:139-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-7526-0


Matud MP. Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Pers Individ Differ. 2004;37(7):1401-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.010


Madhyastha S, Latha KS, Kamath A. Stress, coping and gender differences in third year medical students. J Health Manag. 2014;16(2):315-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063414526124


Bibi F, Chaudhry AG, Awan EA. Impact of gender, age and culture on life satisfaction. Sci Int (Lahore). 2015;27(2):1649-52.


Gündoğar D, Sallan Gül S, Uşkun E, Demirci S, Keçeci D. Investigation of the predictors of life satisfaction in university students. Turk J Psychiatry. 2007;10(1):14-27.


Antaramian S. The importance of very high life satisfaction for students’ academic success. Cogent Education. 2017;4(1):1307622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1307622


Paschali A, Tsitsas G. Stress and life satisfaction among university students-a pilot study. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2010;9(Suppl 1):S96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-9-S1-S96


Bailey RC, Miller C. Life satisfaction and life demands in college students. Soc Behav Pers. 1998;26(1):51-6. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1998.26.1.51


Ading CE, Seok CB, Hashmi SI, Maakip I. Religion and gender differences in stress, happiness and life satisfaction. Southeast Asia Psychology Journal. 2012;1:46-55.


Cabras C, Mondo M. Coping strategies, optimism, and life satisfaction among first-year university students in Italy: Gender and age differences. High Edu. 2018;75:643-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0161-x